I still don't understand what the point of this is. How is he going to rise if he's not eating? He didn't really eat any of his dinner or overnight food, so wouldn't that be what's causing the lower than normal numbers and we need to get food in him?you may want to stall without feeding and wait for the rise.
At the end of the insulin cycle the numbers will rise.I still don't understand what the point of this is. How is he going to rise if he's not eating? He didn't really eat any of his dinner or overnight food, so wouldn't that be what's causing the lower than normal numbers and we need to get food in him?
I've read it I'm just not understanding how it applies to his general situation with being ketone prone and having previously been told he needs to eat and get his insulin above all else, and his current situation where he hasn't eaten in so long.When you get a lot nger duration of +13 or +14, that's when you get carry over and overlap.
Look in the new to group sticky there are explanations and links to the terms so that you can understand how Lantus works.
It doesn't end abruptly, I can't advise you to shoot a number that is lower than usual because I won't be there to help you when you get it, unless he is below 50, you should probably shoot and assist feed if necessary. You will have a couple of hours at least before the next shot onsets.Okay, but he hasn't eaten in like 11 hours, so isn't it an artificial low? Also, didn't someone tell me you don't want to stall more than 30 minutes? If the cycle is taking +13 and we're only waiting 30 minutes, how does that help? This just seems completely counter-intuitive to me right now.
Looking good at +1+1 is 80, giving him some more food
+2 86. I have to head out for about an hour so I'm feeding him a little more with 1tsp of HC gravy on top to slow the onset and I'll check him when I get back.
Yeah, I ideally I would have stuck with the normal food but dr's apt + ride share, wasn't sure exactly when I'd be back. But it worked out and I'm here on time. And the +3 is 110 so doesn't look like we bumped it too badly.I would have probably ideally stuck with LC, if you were sure to be back at +3. However if there's a chance you are going to be held up then I understand the choice, just wanted to explain that when faced with this sort of pattern/situation LC would be a better choice, if you have a variety of LC perhaps LC in the higher end of the range 7-9%.
So far it's been looking like he onsets at +2 - +3 but like you said, lots of changes. He's settled into the kind of food he wants to eat, now we just have to nail down the schedule and delivery method.He may be onsetting a little later than your average cat, but I'm not so sure, because you've been changing carbs and feeding schedule and that will skew the numbers somewhat. Once you settle down into a regular feeding pattern and food type it will become more apparent.
I have, but I know with his history of DKA and the recent p'titis flare things are bit atypical so I'm still trying to work out how closely to follow that, when to stall and by how much, when to hold the shot (if ever), etc.
I know right? This is right where we want to be. I was thinking we might need to increase the dose but now it's looking more like this is good and he was just bouncing the last couple days.In spite of all, those are beautiful numbers.
Absolutely with his recent health issues you want to shoot as long as it's safe. The idea of getting those extra tests is to forewarn you so you know what to expect. Because I was out and on my phone I didn't see that you had got a +11.75 and a +12, those two numbers were flat, so you could see he wasn't diving at that point. So chances were that it was going to be less 'exciting' of a cycle. There was every chance that the BG would be rising as the insulin onset, causing the numbers to level out.I have, but I know with his history of DKA and the recent p'titis flare things are bit atypical so I'm still trying to work out how closely to follow that, when to stall and by how much, when to hold the shot (if ever), etc.
Yup, I'll get a +9If you've not fed any HC since +2 you could ease up with the testing. Looks like he's on the way back up.
So just hypothetically if that's what's going on, that would be this morning's dose starting to wear off and the yellow numbers are, for lack of a better term, his "resting" BG? If that's the case,would that indicate this is a good dose and over time that upper range will come down?just the end of this mornings cycle.
And then in that hypothetical, could I expect to possibly see multiple bounces at a particular dose? After some of the reading I was sort of under the impression you might get an initial bounce after adjusting a dose but then it would regulate and stabilize. If there's the possibility of more than one bounce, how do we factor that in to the regulation window for determining dose increases or decreases? Does each bounce basically restart the timing window, or do you just go off the lowest point?may indicate the start of bounce
Not quite, what tells us that this is a good dose for now is that he is getting down into those greens. It's possible that overtime he'll spend more time in green and the overall range will drop at this dose.If that's the case,would that indicate this is a good dose and over time that upper range will come down?
Not always, some kitties, stop bouncing, I've known others to bounce right till they went into remission. Some kitties over time as they spend more time in green and blue will start to bounce less, the bounces are less prominent and don't last as long. Hard as it is to see those pinks when he is bouncing, we ignore those, our dosing is not based on the bouncing, but on the nadirs when they clear those bounces, so the 80 today. Bear in mind that bounces can clear at night too, so that pm data, is important in trying to determine how low he is going.After some of the reading I was sort of under the impression you might get an initial bounce after adjusting a dose but then it would regulate and stabilize. If there's the possibility of more than one bounce, how do we factor that in to the regulation window for determining dose increases or decreases?
Sounds like a good plan.Okay, that all makes sense.
I'm going to start trying to get pm +2 more consistently. And with his low numbers today I was going to play it by ear for tonight. If it looks like he's rising still I'll just get the +2 but if it looks like he's coming back down again I'll wake up and get some mid-PM cycle checks also.