Yes, the (84) I recorded a few moments ago was right at +3.5 (9:30pm) as always and the consistency is true for all checks, .... except today PMPS was (15) minutes later (6:15pm) today only so I do not know if the (84) reading is a the result of the total duration was actually 3.25 hours instead of 3.5 hours just a thought I like to be precise on all data points ==> this precision on all factors leads to better analysis and forecasting.
I wouldn't fuss a 15 minute difference, I suspect if you'd have caught it at exactly 6:00, it would likely have been not much different. That's one of the beautiful things about really typically flat Lantus cycles like what Henry gets. I'm just slightly jealous