Brianna & Xander
Very Active Member
2/24/25
Morning everyone,
Looks like we're set to have a repeat of yesterday's morning cycle with the same AMPS. Dying to break out of this and see some good numbers again. As always, things were just starting to get going when we had to reduce/skip.
The new vet wants me to send her the pdfs from LibreView (so just the constant curve) a couple of times a week, so she's definitely planning to watch closely. My problem is that the guidelines she sent me for "our plan" are so vastly different from everything I've learned here and have been doing. I don't want to switch to something that seems like it will be a lot less effective than I've seen TR be, but if she's going to be watching that closely I don't know what I can do.
This is what she sent me. Emphasis is mine, just to point out specific things that directly contradict everything else I've read.
This seems like a weird mixture of SLGS with something unnamed (increases of 0.5-1 rather than 0.25) while staying extremely conservative (decreasing by 1 if <80). Also the "base dose adjustments on PSBG rather than nadir." There'll be no consistency with adjusting that way and that was my whole problem to begin with and gaining consistency is why I've switched to TR.
She also thinks that he could still be adjusting to switching entirely to wet food in mid-January, but I really think that's resolved by now, especially since he was having like 98% wet before that, it's just when I stopped leaving out any dry food for him overnight (which he almost never touched anyway). And to keep the 1.5 for another full week "at least." I know he's all wonky from the blue and then the reduce>skip>PFS but if he doesn't start responding to the 1.5 in the next couple of cycles I was going to be increasing to 1.75.
I know no one's going to necessarily tell me "ignore your vet," but am I crazy or does this seem like not the best route? I want to continue what I'm doing and see if I can get TR to work, but as an autistic person who struggles with things like self-advocacy and confrontation, I'm honestly a little afraid to not do what she says. Just hoping for some thoughts/suggestions!
Morning everyone,
Looks like we're set to have a repeat of yesterday's morning cycle with the same AMPS. Dying to break out of this and see some good numbers again. As always, things were just starting to get going when we had to reduce/skip.
The new vet wants me to send her the pdfs from LibreView (so just the constant curve) a couple of times a week, so she's definitely planning to watch closely. My problem is that the guidelines she sent me for "our plan" are so vastly different from everything I've learned here and have been doing. I don't want to switch to something that seems like it will be a lot less effective than I've seen TR be, but if she's going to be watching that closely I don't know what I can do.
This is what she sent me. Emphasis is mine, just to point out specific things that directly contradict everything else I've read.
NOTE: (rounded down to the nearest unit, and ≤ 2 U per cat q 12 hr regardless of weight).
Base dose adjustments on pre-insulin blood glucose value rather than nadir.
• If pre-insulin blood glucose concentration >290 mg/dL, increase glargine by 1 IU per cat.
• Do not change dose if pre-insulin blood glucose concentration is 220–290 mg/dL.
• Decrease dose by 0.5–1 IU per cat if pre-insulin glucose is 80–180 mg/dL.
• Decrease by 1 IU per cat if glucose <80 mg/dL. If clinical hypoglycemia occurs the dose should be
decreased by 50%.
This seems like a weird mixture of SLGS with something unnamed (increases of 0.5-1 rather than 0.25) while staying extremely conservative (decreasing by 1 if <80). Also the "base dose adjustments on PSBG rather than nadir." There'll be no consistency with adjusting that way and that was my whole problem to begin with and gaining consistency is why I've switched to TR.
She also thinks that he could still be adjusting to switching entirely to wet food in mid-January, but I really think that's resolved by now, especially since he was having like 98% wet before that, it's just when I stopped leaving out any dry food for him overnight (which he almost never touched anyway). And to keep the 1.5 for another full week "at least." I know he's all wonky from the blue and then the reduce>skip>PFS but if he doesn't start responding to the 1.5 in the next couple of cycles I was going to be increasing to 1.75.
I know no one's going to necessarily tell me "ignore your vet," but am I crazy or does this seem like not the best route? I want to continue what I'm doing and see if I can get TR to work, but as an autistic person who struggles with things like self-advocacy and confrontation, I'm honestly a little afraid to not do what she says. Just hoping for some thoughts/suggestions!
