Im sure this question must have been asked previously but I cant find any info about it, so apologies for wasting anyone's time and please re-direct me to where the info is, if it exists.
Has anyone undertaken direct comparisons of blood glucose readings on human-calibrated blood glucose meters, and those calibrated for cats? The various datasheets that have been set up (US vs international, human vs cat meters), seem to suggest that 2.8mmol on a human meter is the same as 3.8mmol on a cat-calibrated meter, for example.
My cat just had a BG reading of 9.7mmol at the vets but tested 7.9mmol at home a few minutes later on my Freestyle Optium Neo. Im interested if any direct comparison of the various meters have been undertaken so that we can say with certainty that a reading of 'x' on meter 1 is actually the same as a reading of 'y' on meter 2. My vet gets concerned when my cats BG is towards the lower range of desirable, but I don't because I believe that whatever reading I am getting on my human-calibrated meter, his BG will actually be a little big higher than that if I was using a cat meter. I would love to know if my assumption is correct or not.
thanks
Joanne
PS. this thread just posted to the main forum page without asking me where I wanted it to go. Not sure how to move it. Apologies if its in the wrong place and please relocate if you can (or tell me how to do it and I will move it)
Has anyone undertaken direct comparisons of blood glucose readings on human-calibrated blood glucose meters, and those calibrated for cats? The various datasheets that have been set up (US vs international, human vs cat meters), seem to suggest that 2.8mmol on a human meter is the same as 3.8mmol on a cat-calibrated meter, for example.
My cat just had a BG reading of 9.7mmol at the vets but tested 7.9mmol at home a few minutes later on my Freestyle Optium Neo. Im interested if any direct comparison of the various meters have been undertaken so that we can say with certainty that a reading of 'x' on meter 1 is actually the same as a reading of 'y' on meter 2. My vet gets concerned when my cats BG is towards the lower range of desirable, but I don't because I believe that whatever reading I am getting on my human-calibrated meter, his BG will actually be a little big higher than that if I was using a cat meter. I would love to know if my assumption is correct or not.
thanks
Joanne
PS. this thread just posted to the main forum page without asking me where I wanted it to go. Not sure how to move it. Apologies if its in the wrong place and please relocate if you can (or tell me how to do it and I will move it)